HISTÓRIA KÖNYVTÁR
OKMÁNYTÁRAK
3.


GABRIELLA ERDÉLYI (ed.)

The Register of a Convent Controversy (1517–1518)

Pope Leo X, Cardinal Bakócz, the Augustinians and the observant Franciscans in contest (CVH II/1)

Budapest-Rome, 2006
pp. ix–lxxxvii + 230 + 12 suppl. (pictures, facsimiles, maps)

NEM MEGRENDELHETŐ
(Kereskedelmi forgalomban kapható a Magiszter és a Kis Magiszter könyvesboltban )

 



CONTENTS

 
   
First Part  

Introduction

IX
I. The source and its Church historical context
XI
     About the register of the process
XI
     The pope, the cardinal-primate and the friars
XV
II. Approaches of social and cultural history
LXVI
     The witness hearing
LXX
     Crisis and reform of convent life
LXXVIII
     Final remarks
LXXXIV
III. The methods of publication
LXXXVI
   
Second Part

     The register of the process

1
     Sources
199
     Bibliography
201
     Abbreviations
209
     Index
211
 

In this volume of the series Collectanea Vaticana Hungariae dedicated to publish sources and monographs based on documents kept in Italian archives we have on our hands a unique source from the Vatican Apostolic Library.

In 1518, the possession of the local convent in the market town of Körmend was disputed by two rivaling mendicant orders. The case was investigated upon papal order, in the course of which dozens of witnesses were heard. As the patron of the convent, Thomas Bakócz cardinal-legate claimed, the convent stood in a very bad condition and provided no liturgical services due to the negligent and sinful life of the friars: they frequented taverns, where they behaved as violent drunkards, and kept lovers, whom they entertained in the convent. The meticulously recorded depositions of local inhabitants contain many interesting stories and open, therefore, a window upon the everyday life of a market town and its neighbourhood.

The Introduction (ix–lxxxvii) reflects upon the possible uses of the source and the interpretation of this convent controversy from multiple viewpoints. With respect to the general historiographical significance of the Latin source, the volume has been published entirely in English. Its utility is ensured by a Bibliography (pp. 201–208) and an Index (pp. 211–224) including a subject index.


******